Banca de DEFESA: ALISON COSTA DO NASCIMENTO

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : ALISON COSTA DO NASCIMENTO
DATA : 03/12/2020
HORA: 14:00
LOCAL: Videoconferência
TÍTULO:

INSTITUTIONAL SELF-EVALUATION. DEMOCRACY AND PARTICIPATION IN A FEDERAL PUBLIC UNIVERSITY


PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Institutional self-evaluation. Own Evaluation Committee. Participation. Community representatives.


PÁGINAS: 58
GRANDE ÁREA: Outra
ÁREA: Multidisciplinar
RESUMO:

This dissertation was organized in the form of a collection, consisting of two articles elaborated during the development of the research. The first article, which we call RESEARCHES RELATED TO INSTITUTIONAL SELF-EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: MAIN APPROACHES AND FOCUS, sought to identify and analyze the main recurrent approaches in research dedicated to institutional self-assessment of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). For the selection of articles, the following descriptors were used: “higher education evaluation”, “institutional self-evaluation” AND “higher education”, “self-evaluation” AND “Own Evaluation Committee”. Four main approaches were identified: (1) studies that focus analysis on self-evaluation as a management tool, (2) the role of the Evaluation Committee in conducting the process, (3) the perception that community members have in relation to self-evaluation and (4) research that deals with issues concerning community participation and involvement in the institutional self-evaluation process. As a result, there was an absence of research that investigated the theme of participation in depth, especially the participation of community representatives in the planning and development of the self-evaluation activity in the Evaluation Committee. Having identified this gap, we developed the second article, entitled INSTITUTIONAL SELF-EVALUATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PARTICIPATION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY OF A FEDERAL PUBLIC UNIVERSITY. This study develops a comparative analysis of the participation of representatives of the academic community in the Evaluation Committee of the Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia. For the development of the research, we used the bylaws, the minutes of election of members and minutes of meetings of the Commission. By making a systematic reading and qualitative analysis of the Commission's internal regulations, participation was assessed from a normative point of view, highlighting issues related to the decision-making power, leadership and mandate of each segment. In a survey carried out in the minutes of election, quantitative data of registrants were tabulated to compete for the role of representative member in the composition of the CPA, verifying the adhesion and / or interest of each category to compete in the election. Starting from a qualitative-quantitative approach to data from the minutes of meetings, the form of performance, involvement and frequency of each category was observed. The results demonstrate that there is a significant imbalance of participation between the three representations of the community. Therefore, it is necessary to build strategies to promote equity in participation between representations, placing them in positions of equal involvement, power and influence.


MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Interno - 285862 - FLAVIA GOULART MOTA GARCIA ROSA
Externo ao Programa - 1544474 - FRANSLEY LIMA SANTOS
Interno - 1810774 - RENATA MEIRA VERAS
Notícia cadastrada em: 02/12/2020 10:40
SIGAA | STI/SUPAC - - | Copyright © 2006-2024 - UFBA