Banca de DEFESA: REINALDO BATISTA DOS SANTOS FILHO

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : REINALDO BATISTA DOS SANTOS FILHO
DATA : 27/11/2020
HORA: 15:30
LOCAL: São Lázaro
TÍTULO:

Freedom and Authority - a possible reconciliation

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Freedom, Authority, Hannan Arent

PÁGINAS: 82
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Humanas
ÁREA: Filosofia
SUBÁREA: História da Filosofia
RESUMO:

It´s perceived that both propaedeutic commentators of Hannah Arendt´s books and her more conceptual critics, make such a characteristic and punctual approach between the authority and the freedom, that generally, it´s suspected, it up hiding ends any possibility of the affinity of these concepts. In general lines, this dissertation is guided by the objective of clarifying the possible conciliation between the concepts of authority and freedom in Hannah Arendt´s political philosophy. Books of the 60, notably  On revolution (1963) and Between past and the future (1968), and also some of her essays, in which Arendt asserts that, if on the one hand, the ancient régime distanced the freedom public from men, the seventeenth-century revolutions faced difficulties in an attempt to conceive another anchor reference for a new political authority whose purpose would be to ensure the revolutionary spirit of participation. From a theoretical point of view, it is understood that, when trying to reconcile authority with republican freedom, some modern philosophers ended up denying authority and making full freedom impossible. For Hobbes, but also for Rousseau, authority is understood around the concept of sovereignty. For if for the former authority corresponded to the Sovereign properly constituted and immune to any challenge, for the second, the authority corresponded to the people themselves, who, as a result of a "General Will", ended up being defined in terms of sovereignty. Freedom in Hannah Arendt's work is participation in the affairs of politics, and it is through her that the entire revolution is built. However, if in theory and in practice the establishment of the new republican authority caused a certain impediment to republican freedom, Arendt is based on the actions of the revolutionary council system and proves this incompatibility to be false. To justify this claim, we return to the approach of the sense of politics in the face of the emergence of the totalitarian regime and its source of authority. We also look at how the relationship of the authoritarian regime appears in Hannah Arendt's thinking. Finally, we analyze the relationship between the revolutionary freedom of the council system and the new republican authority in the form of a constitution. Given the above, we believe we can suggest that, despite the concept of sovereignty, Arendt admits a link of conciliation between public authority and freedom

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Interno - 1083320 - DANIEL TOURINHO PERES
Interno - 2358689 - LEONARDO JORGE DA HORA PEREIRA
Externo ao Programa - 1197679 - RENATO FRANCISQUINI TEIXEIRA
Externo à Instituição - RENATA REVERENDO VIDAL KAWANO NAGAMINE