Banca de DEFESA: IVSON CONCEIÇÃO SILVA

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : IVSON CONCEIÇÃO SILVA
DATA : 24/08/2020
HORA: 14:00
LOCAL: Faced UFBA (remoto)
TÍTULO:

ONTOLOGICAL CRITICISM TO THE FRAGMENTATION OF THEORETICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC PREMISES IN THE PRODUCTION / CIRCULATION OF KNOWLEDGE IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN THE STATE OF BAHIA

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Materialist ontology, history and dialectics. Knowledge production. Theoretical and programmatic premises. Physical Education. Historical project.

PÁGINAS: 276
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Humanas
ÁREA: Educação
RESUMO:

The present doctoral thesis is an ontological investigation about the causalities that influence the fragmentation of the theoretical premises of scientific production. It presents the following problem: what are the teleologically placed causal nexuses that ontologically determine the fragmentation between the theoretical and programmatic premises in the production of hegemonic knowledge in Physical Education in the state of Bahia? The objective was to analyze, understand and explain the teleologically placed causal nexuses that ontologically determine the fragmentation between the theoretical and programmatic premises in the production of hegemonic knowledge in Physical Education in the state of Bahia and to point out overcoming possibilities from an ontological-conclusive synthesis. In the methodological field, bibliographic research was used as a permanent technique of the investigation and exhibition process. To characterize the data, we use descriptive research. To debug the internal logic of knowledge production, we use epistemological research from the analytical matrix, proceeding as follows: 1) survey of the theses in the online databases of EPISTEF / Bahia; 2) analytical reading of dissertations and theses, to apprehend the concept of human being / society as an ontological premise; 3) record of the analytical reading in a Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheet and progressive synthesis considering the seized data. The central debate of the thesis used materialistic, historical and dialectical ontology, presenting work as an ontological centrality of human development, as a teleologically guided act to put an end to a natural object. From this he develops his explanations about the relationship between: natural causality and posed causality; subject-object; spontaneous and finalistic teleology; formation of higher psychological functions; everyday and scientific knowledge. It assumes that human beings and society form an indivisible complex. Notes that there are three divergent perspectives on the concept of human being / society: a) primacy of the objective aspect; b) emphasis on the subjective; c) the dialectical relationship between subjective and objective, with predominance of the two fragmentary perspectives. From these understandings, the following conceptions of society unfold: natural and impossible to be known in its essence and, consequently, to be altered; 2) sociocultural, but its change can only occur in the individual subjective sphere; 3) as a historical product that can be known and radically changed in its essence. Considering these elements, it establishes the relationship between the production / circulation of knowledge analyzed with the material base, exposing as causal nexuses teleologically placed those who influence these: underdevelopment as a consequence of the containment of productive forces genetically linked to colonialism, neocolonialism and imperialism; the uneven development in the international division of labor between advanced capitalist (producing) and underdeveloped (consuming) nations; pluriparticular national infrastructure between highly productive regional islands by multinationals in contradiction with large pre-capitalist areas; economic development based on market interests, to the detriment of social progress. The ontological-conclusive synthesis confirms the need for scientific production to recover materialist, historical and dialectic ontology as a theoretical instrument that makes it possible to analyze, understand and explain reality in its being-properly-so; advocates a radical, rigorous and comprehensive analysis of the objects / phenomena of scientific investigation. It points out elements for the construction of a political program through various instruments of organization and struggle of the working class to break with the causal nexuses teleologically placed in the capitalist way of producing sociability: a) contradictory and indivisible unity between theory and practice, program and actions, subject and object, reality and thought, science and politics, science and ideology, history and historical project, ontology and teleology: b) defense of the expanded training of Physical Education teachers, as a strategy to break with the fragmentation between undergraduate and bachelor's degrees; c) political training of Physical Education teachers, and of teachers in general, for the strengthening of working class organizations (parties, unions, associations, social struggles, scientific entities and others); d) projection of an economic development based on the perspective of national sovereignty and human formation; e) mastery of science, in the human-social perspective, to overcome technological subordination based on the interests of markets imposed by multinationals and multilateral organizations; f) union with nations that have an interest in freeing themselves from the yoke of capital, for the constitution of an international anti-imperialist front, to enter a permanent process of revolution by precipitating the wasting of the capital's metabolic system

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - 1215033 - CLAUDIO DE LIRA SANTOS JUNIOR
Interno - 1130452 - CELI NELZA ZULKE TAFFAREL
Externo ao Programa - 4298534 - MARIZE SOUZA CARVALHO
Externo à Instituição - SILVIO ANCISAR SÁNCHEZ GAMBOA - UNICAMP
Externo à Instituição - KATIA OLIVER DE SA
Externo à Instituição - JOELMA DE OLIVEIRA ALBUQUERQUE - UFAL
Externo à Instituição - MÁRCIA MORSCHBACHER - UFSM