Banca de DEFESA: HELENA TULER CRESTON

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : HELENA TULER CRESTON
DATA : 30/11/2020
HORA: 15:30
LOCAL: Plataforma online google meet, via link: meet.google.com/vgh-enbt-cbf
TÍTULO:

Patrimoniology: twilight between tactical identity and differences to become.


PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

cultural heritage; rhizomatic thinking; identity; territory; resistance.


PÁGINAS: 417
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
ÁREA: Arquitetura e Urbanismo
RESUMO:

The present study intents to show a view into the cultural heritage, from a rhizomatic perspective, pushing the concept of identity in this Field, related to territorial conflicts in Brazil. Therefore, the term “patrimoniology” refers to this other logic (logy) about cultural heritage, applying the rhizome principles developed by Deleuze and Guattari. These principles have also guided the structure of the thesis, turning it into a connectable map allowing thoughts to come in and out. Theoretical concepts about territoriality, race and ethnicity; those are also the conceptual foundations of the study of anthropology, especially the so-called “political anthropology”; decolonial contributions; notes about the concepts of memory, narration and history; the usage of models as ways to think and connect, and other lines of thought. All these theoretical structures merged into this “rhizome of affects” triggered by the following events: the preservation of “Terreiro Casa Branca”, in Salvador/BA, in the 1980s; the territorial expropriation in favor of the “Quilombo da Caçandoca”, in Ubatuba/SP, in 2006; and the resistance announcement made by the Guarani-Kaiowá, in 2012, against the intention to expel them out from their lands in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, in Brazil. The territorial identity connects these events and is present on the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, refering to the “groups who built the nation” and their territorial rights related to this condition. Therefore, this research is about black and indigenous territorialities, highlighting the political value of identity: identity formed by their struggle for territories. In this sense, when problematizing the controversial notion of identity versus plurality (rhizomatic thinking), the thesis sees difference as a direction in the perspective of the micropolitics of subjectivations, though it validates the identity as tactic of resistance (or existence) under the existing macropolitics. Also, it highlights the resulting issues and human agendas brought up, emphasizing the power of creation by leaving any loose ends able to connect with other subjectivities. And then, it invites to other montages and maps. “It is necessary to resist, by creating!”


MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - 002.334.205-68 - PASQUALINO ROMANO MAGNAVITA - UFBA
Interno - 510.569.177-68 - MARGARETH APARECIDA CAMPOS DA SILVA PEREIRA - UFBA
Externo ao Programa - 2466764 - ARIADNE MORAES SILVA
Externo à Instituição - JOSÉ MAURÍCIO ANDION ARRUTI - UNICAMP
Externo à Instituição - RAQUEL MANNA JULIÃO - IFMG
Notícia cadastrada em: 01/10/2020 12:13
SIGAA | STI/SUPAC - - | Copyright © 2006-2024 - UFBA