Banca de DEFESA: ALEXSANDRO TENÓRIO PORANGABA
Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.DISCENTE : ALEXSANDRO TENÓRIO PORANGABA
DATA : 27/09/2019
HORA: 15:00
LOCAL: Casa da Congregação | Faculdade de Arquitetura da UFBA
TÍTULO:
The place of Social Interest Housing in the teaching of architecture and urbanism in Brazil: a curricular analysis (1930-2018)
PALAVRAS-CHAVES:
Architecture and Urbanism Teaching (Brazil); Housing of Social Interest; Curriculum.
PÁGINAS: 324
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
ÁREA: Arquitetura e Urbanismo
SUBÁREA: Fundamentos de Arquitetura e Urbanismo
ESPECIALIDADE: História da Arquitetura e Urbanismo
RESUMO:
Issues related to housing problem and the teaching of architecture and urbanism have been a current topic of debate among professionals in the area since 1930, when the first congresses were held in Brazil. In these events, the congressmen highlighted the importance of greater involvement of architects and urbanists with housing production directed to the low-income population and, contradictorily, showed the desire to maintain an essentially artistic teaching, focused on the appreciation of the works of great architectural compositions. This view has been the object of denunciation and contestation over the years in academia. On the one hand, the controversies revolve around the argument that the teaching of architecture and urbanism, still based on archaic molds, has not prioritized the theme of Housing of Social Interest (HSI) in the professional training of architects and city planners. On the other hand, on the thesis that the generalist profile of the architecture and urbanism courses does not include the explicitness of specific subjects as essential, especially in the subjects which deal with architectural project. All this problematization finds its place of origin in the official national curricula of architecture and urbanism courses, which have legitimized consensus discourses and hegemonic practices in the area. Therefore, the general objective of this thesis is to investigate how the theme of HSI was approached in the official national curricula of the architecture and urbanism courses, instituted between 1962 and 2010. To this end, a qualitative documentary analysis was developed, based on the critical perspective of curriculum, more precisely, from the relational analysis, which considered the historical, political, economic and social context of the country from 1930 to 2018, taking three axes as starting points: 1) housing production directed to the low income population; 2) professional and academic events on the housing problem and the teaching of architecture and urbanism; 3) the teaching of architecture and urbanism. Research has shown that the process of constituting the official national curricula of architecture and urbanism courses has been hegemonically grounded in traditional curriculum practices which reproduce a culture of knowledge selection that tends to depoliticize and turn issues related to Housing of Social Interest into supposedly neutral rather than priority problems. As a result, these issues have ended up being allocated primarily to research and extension activities, while in architecture and urbanism teaching they have occupied a secondary or even smaller place, especially in the courses offered by Federal Universities, since most institutions do not legitimize the theme of HSI as mandatory activities. Of the 32 federal courses analyzed, only 7 establish an explicit commitment to the problem of HSI, inserting it as a priority and mandatory knowledge, especially in activities related to architectural project.
MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - 2230469 - NAIA ALBAN SUAREZ
Interno - 085.114.385-72 - ANGELA MARIA GORDILHO SOUZA - UFBA
Interno - 3420362 - NIVALDO VIEIRA DE ANDRADE JUNIOR
Externo ao Programa - 3466650 - SERGIO KOPINSKI EKERMAN
Externo à Instituição - JOSÉ DE SOUZA BRANDÃO - UFPE
Externo à Instituição - JULIANA TORRES DE MIRANDA - UFMG